New Research Challenges ‘Delay to 70’ Social Security Consensus
Recent research highlighted by BenefitNews argues that claiming Social Security at 62 can be financially rational for many households once real-world behavior, spending patterns, and risk preferences are factored in, pushing back against the standard advice to delay to 70. This comes as other studies still show large lifetime gains from delaying, underscoring that optimal timing is highly individual.
Source: BenefitNews ·
Recent research suggests that claiming Social Security benefits at age 62 could be a smart choice for some people, especially when you consider your health and spending habits. As you plan for retirement, think about how the timing of your Social Security can work alongside your investment strategy and any spousal benefits you might have. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, so take the time to find a plan that feels right for you and your needs.
- •New analysis suggests early claiming at 62 can be rational when accounting for health, longevity risk, and spending preferences.
- •The research contrasts with earlier work (e.g., NBER, United Income) indicating most households maximize lifetime benefits by delaying to 70.
- •The debate reinforces that Social Security timing should be integrated with portfolio risk, withdrawal strategy, and spousal benefits.
If you are 1–5 years from retirement, this research supports doing a personalized break-even and risk analysis instead of blindly delaying to 70. For those worried about running out of money or markets dropping, claiming earlier to protect against sequence risk while reducing portfolio withdrawals may make sense, but you should stress-test both early and delayed scenarios under different market and longevity assumptions.