Congress is looking to repeal a Social Security rule that impacts retirees who are still earning
Lawmakers have introduced the Senior Citizens' Freedom to Work Act to repeal the Social Security Retirement Earnings Test, which currently reduces benefits for people below full retirement age who keep working and earn above set income thresholds.
Source: Yahoo Finance ·
If this earnings test gets repealed, the financial penalty for working past your early claiming age disappears—turning what's now a hidden tax on side income into genuine flexibility. For someone in their late 50s or early 60s considering a phased retirement or part-time consulting work, this could reshape the math on when to claim benefits. Right now, earnings above $24,480 trigger a $1-for-$2 benefit reduction before full retirement age; elimination of that rule removes a significant planning constraint. Worth running the numbers on how your Social Security timing would change if you could earn without penalty—it might open options for delayed claiming that looked impossible before.
- •The proposed Senior Citizens' Freedom to Work Act would eliminate the Retirement Earnings Test that lets Social Security claw back $1 of benefits for every $2 earned above an annual threshold before full retirement age.
- •For 2026, the RET threshold is $24,480 for those reaching full retirement age in 2027 or later, and $65,160 with lighter withholding rules for those reaching full retirement age in 2026.[2]
- •Repealing the RET would make it easier for near-retirees to work and earn more without losing Social Security benefits, simplifying planning around part-time work and phased retirement.
If passed, this change would give workers in their early 60s more flexibility to work and earn before full retirement age without losing Social Security benefits, which directly affects decisions about when to claim, how much to work, and how to coordinate income with catch-up contributions and Roth conversions.