Congress is looking to repeal a Social Security rule that impacts retirees who are still earning — is it the right move?
Lawmakers have introduced the Senior Citizens' Freedom to Work Act to repeal the Retirement Earnings Test, which currently withholds part of Social Security benefits from people below full retirement age who keep working and earn above set income thresholds.
Source: Yahoo Finance ·
If this rule gets repealed, the financial math on when to claim Social Security could shift significantly for people who plan to keep working into their early 60s. Right now, claiming benefits before full retirement age while earning above $24,480 annually triggers a $1-for-$2 benefit withholding—a real penalty that makes early claiming less attractive. Eliminating this test would remove that friction, making it possible to collect benefits and paychecks simultaneously without involuntary clawbacks. Worth running the numbers on whether claiming earlier (if the rule changes) plus continued work income could replace your need for portfolio withdrawals during those early retirement years.
- •The proposal would eliminate the Retirement Earnings Test, which now causes benefits to be withheld for workers under full retirement age who earn above annual limits.
- •In 2026, Social Security withholds $1 in benefits for every $2 earned above $24,480 for those reaching normal retirement age in 2027 or later, and uses a higher threshold with more favorable withholding for those reaching normal retirement age in 2026.[1]
- •Removing this rule would make it easier for people in their early 60s to work and claim benefits simultaneously without worrying about clawbacks, although long‑term program costs and solvency are part of the policy debate.[1]
If passed, this change would give mid‑career workers more flexibility to work in their 60s while drawing Social Security earlier without having benefits temporarily reduced, which affects when to claim benefits and how to plan part‑time or encore work near retirement.